In Chapter Two of Baym's "Personal Connections in the Digital
Age," she talks mainly about the technological theory called technological
determinism. This is the idea that technology enters society as an active force
of change and we cannot resist it. Through this theory, technology changes
us.
Baym goes over the
idea that technology has the ultimate power to change who we are as humans and
our society as a whole. She references the idea that technology is making us
stupid. This, however, is nothing new. Socrates claimed that introducing the alphabet
would make society stupid. In a way, he was right. Since the alphabet has come
into play, humans no longer buy into things unless they are written down.
Spoken word has lost credibility and our memories have even faded since we no longer
rely on them to remember the things we can write down instead. In much the same
way, Nick Carr believes that Google has made him stupid. Now that he has the
power to look something up and find the result immediately, his attention span
has gotten noticeably worse. He claims that he has a hard time reading for long
periods of time before he must change what he is doing in the fear of getting
bored.
I do not think
that the problem is about technology changing us; I believe it is about
how much we rely on the new technology. I believe that humans can resist a new
form of technology by not immediately shifting their total reliance to it. This
is evident in the alphabet example. If society accepted the new technology of
the alphabet and used it in moderation, the technology would not have altered
society so much. Instead, society took the alphabet and put all reliance on it.
This reliance is what changed society. The same goes for Nick Carr and most of
the world that have access to the internet. If our smart phones and the
internet were used in moderation, our society might still be able to read for
long periods of time or hold an argument without looking up the answer. Society
cannot resist the temptation of technology, but worst of all; we cannot resist
the temptation of reliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment